Re: moving image

From: edwin gendron <egendron_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 14 Nov 2000 - 12:49:40 PST

If registration becomes a problem, perhaps you could use an old 16mm
splicing block (which has sprockets for registration) a new plastic
one costs something like $10 - $20. Just a thought . I have no idea
how you plan to advance the film though. If you can work out the
"advance" mechanism, this very same idea could be applied to 35mm
motion picture as well.

>Hello, all:
>
>I just subscribed (as of yesterday), having cast about for a way to shoot
>a 16 mm film without renting a camera, without paying a lab's developing
>fee, and without boring my easily-bored eyes. Hitting the web for tips, I
>have rigged a little canister for 35 mm still photography with both
>pinhole and slots through which to advance 16 mm film. It was a lazy
>Sunday I spent dabbling without much conviction, scrounging around for
>tape, glue, a box, you know the story. I am still amazed that this should
>work, in theory at least. We have a simple mechanism for advancing the
>frame and keeping registration without exposing frames to light until they
>enter the gate of the canister. Has this been done? Once exposed, I'll
>have only to hand-process the thing. And then, . . a movie . . of
>pinhole photographs!
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
>Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
>unsubscribe or change your account at
>http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/

-- 
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Edwin Gendron
Virginia Tech
Residential and Dining Programs Graphics
43 Owens Hall (0223)
Blacksburg, Va. 24061
(540)231-5398
egendron@vt.edu
Received on Tue Nov 14 15:50:01 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:15:56 PST