Re: SX-70 pinhole instructions

From: Mike Vande Bunt <Mike.VandeBunt_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Wed 04 Oct 2000 - 21:19:28 PDT

The SX-70 backs are quite expensive. They weren't cheap when
Polaroid was still making them and now they fetch collector prices.
The price is comparable to the price, new, of a Polaroid 545i back.
If you're going to build a camera around a Polaroid back, the 545 is
better than the SX-70 because it takes a wide variety of film (b&w
and color) with speeds from 100 to 3000 (yes, three thousand!) and
is about twice the size of the SX-70 prints. Polaroid peel apart
films are also quite a bit sharper than the integral films.

Mike Vande Bunt

edwin gendron wrote:

> CC polaroid-pinhole cameras:
> Did you guys know; Polaroid DOES sell just the BACKS to their
> cameras? (the "magazine" part ) Logically, it seems easier to me to
> start by buying one of these, and then build the camera body onto it,
> rather than starting from the opposite direction??
> --
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> Edwin Gendron
> Virginia Tech
> Residential and Dining Programs Graphics
> 43 Owens Hall (0223)
> Blacksburg, Va. 24061
> (540)231-5398
> egendron@vt.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
Received on Thu Oct 5 00:11:59 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:15:55 PST