Re: Re: Scanning Negatives

Richard,

Is the resolution we see exactly what the scanner gave
you? Seems pretty low, too digital.

I loved #3. I'm into water and boats these days.

Leslie

--- Richard Heather <rheather@slonet.org> wrote:
> Hi. I just bought a UMAX 2200. It will sca 81/2x11
> prints or up to 4x5
> transparencies. Works good for B&W negs if they are
> not too dense.
> Doesnt really have the resolution for 35mm but 2
> 1/4x2 1/4 is pretty
> good. It is supposed to do 42bit color and 12 bit
> B&W but I havn't been
> able to make mine work.
> I just uploaded new images from my new Leonardo 3"
> sacnned by the UMAX
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/upload/images/.
> Look for:
> rheather1,2,3,4
> Richard Heather
>
> Jeff Dilcher wrote:
>
> > >Hello!
> > >
> > >I was thinking of upgrading my scanner, and was
> > >hoping to get a unit that might be capable of
> > >scanning 4x5 (b&w) negatives. Does such a thing
> exist?
> > >Are other people here scanning negatives to
> > >create positive "prints" for web pages?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Mon Sep 18 14:43:59 2000