RE: Re: Compensating Reciprocity Failure

From: Andy Schmitt <aschmitt_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Thu 31 Aug 2000 - 14:14:52 PDT

very nice... i would love to see the tree one in person.
andy

-----Original Message-----
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@pinhole.com]On Behalf Of Erich C.
Decker
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 5:01 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Compensating Reciprocity Failure

Hi Benno & Guillermo,

I put your suggestions concerning reciprocity failure to the test
with quite satisfactory results. The chart below was a pretty good
guide indeed.

> (All times in seconds)
>
> Metered Time
> 2 4 8 12 16
> 24 32 45 60 90 120
>
> Exposure Time 3 7 19 33 50 93
> 145 250 378 853 1670
> Development Adj. - - -5% -8% -10% -12% -14%
> -16% -18% -20% -24%

Thanks again for your help,
Erich

P.S.One example is ready for display (the Israelite crypt)
a couple more will follow shortly:

http://rz-home.de/edecker/pinhole.htm
=====================================

_______________________________________________
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@pinhole.com
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.pinhole.com/discussion/
Received on Thu Aug 31 17:14:16 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 13 Dec 2004 - 23:15:55 PST