Re: posting of images to the list?

Nice image Gregg, it downloaded in seconds and had sharp resolution. Although
it is nice to be able to see an image immediately, I also like to know that I
can go to a site where images are stored and I can access them at a later
date. On the other hand quick access would probably make it easier for a lot
more people to view and comment on an image.
Rusty

In a message dated 8/25/00 8:09:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
gregg.kemp@pinhole.com writes:

>
> I'm posting an image to the list to test out a couple of things.
> First, to be sure the list will handle it. And second, to find out
> how it might affect various user's mail.
>
> It has long been against the policy of the list to send images forseveral
> reasons - primarily, the increased space required to store them and the
> additional time it takes to download mail from everyone'sserver.
>
> If this image goes through ok, I ask everyone to NOT start posting images.&
> nbsp; Instead, let's discuss the pros and cons of doing this through the
list.
> For example, we can limit the size of postings to prevent anyone from
> sending any really large files. Or we couldcome up with some guidelines
> to be followed.
>
> We'll need feedback from those of you who are not able to view this image (
> assuming most can). Also, if there is an outcry due to the download
> time, we just want allow posting of images. Please remember that this
> is only a test and proposal for discussion!
>
> So, there should be an image below...
>
> <div align="center">[Unable to display image]
> copyright 2000, Gregg Kemp
>
>
>
Received on Sat Aug 26 13:29:10 2000