Re: Filter the glop?

From: Sandy King <sanking_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Tue 29 May 2007 - 14:54:34 PDT

The four layers of pantyhose sounds like a good idea. But my wife
quit using those a few years back and I am about to run out so I may
have to go with some doubled layers of my own old cotton underwear!!

I just made a tissue batch last evening and used one layer pantyhose
but on drying the tissue seems to have some pigment particles larger
than what I would like.

Sandy

At 2:43 PM -0700 5/29/07, Vaughn Hutchins wrote:
>Dick, Sandy,
>
>I use a doubled up (4 layers) of pantyhose to filter the glop when I pour
>out of the main container into graduated cylinder to measure the amount
>right before I pour.
>
>I have the mixture (glop) in mason jars in a waterbath (105 F). I toss the
>pantyhose in hot water, wring it out, then stretch it over the mouth of the
>mason jar...then pour out gently down the inward side of the graduated
>cylinder -- I pour the tissue straight from the cylinder.
>
>Keeps the beard hairs out, plus I read that it helps get rid of any bubbles
>(I'm not sure about that, but it has become part of my methodology anyway.)
>
>No grainy pigment left in the jar at the end, so either I don't get any
>using watercolor pigment, or it goes thru the pantyhose.
>
>Vaughn
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>carbon mailing list
>carbon@spitbite.org
>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
carbon mailing list
carbon@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
Received on Tue May 29 14:54:48 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 21 Jan 2008 - 02:15:33 PST