[SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: can I comment

Witho,

I think Vaughn reuses his supports, but I discard mine after use.

Sandy

At 11:01 PM +0100 12/28/06, Witho Worms wrote:
>No, I thought that you were mainly using non paper supports because you
>could reuse hem or doing multiple printing in registration.
>
>Witho
>
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: owner-carbon@spitbite.org [mailto:owner-carbon@spitbite.org] Namens
>Sandy King
>Verzonden: donderdag 28 december 2006 21:54
>Aan: carbon@spitbite.org
>Onderwerp: [SPAM] RE: [carbon] can I comment
>
>Witho,
>
>It is just as easy to cut Yupo and Denril MultiMedia Vellum as it is paper?
>
>Or am I missing something here?
>
>
>Sandy
>
>
>
>
>
>At 9:43 PM +0100 12/28/06, Witho Worms wrote:
>>Sandy and Vaughn,
>>
>>If you use a tissue with a 'plastic' support how do you make your tests for
>>carbon. For me is was a major disadvantage using non-paper tissue. With a
>>paper backing I just cut it into the piece I need for testing.
>>
>>Witho
>>
>>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>Van: owner-carbon@spitbite.org [mailto:owner-carbon@spitbite.org] Namens
>>Sandy King
>>Verzonden: donderdag 28 december 2006 21:25
>>Aan: carbon@spitbite.org
>>Onderwerp: Re: [carbon] can I comment
>>
>>At 11:31 AM -0800 12/28/06, Vaughn Hutchins wrote:
>>>public, and to the patron who donated the big bucks to purchase it.
>>>
>>>Sandy...
>>>Just a loose idea...after pouring on a large "fragile" sheet of
>>>paper, if it is hard to move to the drying racks, perhaps one can
>>>slice it in place (in half or whatever) with an exacto knife and
>>>then moved to the drying rack in easier-to-handle pieces? It would
>>>score the material one works on, but that may not be significant.
>>>Good luck in your search for a good tissue support!
>>>
>>>Vaughn
>>
>>
>>Vaughn,
>>
>>I have the problem covered for the moment. About a year or so ago I
>>bought a fairly large stock of Lenox paper, 22X29" for Pt./Pd.
>>printing, based on performance of a previous batch. However, the new
>>stuff is not nearly as good so I need to dispose of it. I have
>>already made a few large tissues with the whole sheets and was able
>>to pick each of them up and deposit on a drying rack. As I recall,
>>the paper was only about $1 a sheet so it is fairly economical.
>>However, it is fairly thick stock and while I won't have trouble with
>>it in my vacuum frames it might be too stiff for use in a contact
>>printing frame.
>>
>>Sandy
>>_______________________________________________
>>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>>carbon mailing list
>>carbon@spitbite.org
>>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
>>_______________________________________________
>>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>>carbon mailing list
>>carbon@spitbite.org
>>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
>>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; name="SpamAssassinReport.txt"
>>Content-Disposition: inline; filename="SpamAssassinReport.txt"
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.414 (Entity 5.414)
>>
>>Spam detection software, running on the system "mx3.clemson.edu", has
>>identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
>>has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
>>similar future email. If you have any questions, see
>>postmaster@clemson.edu for details.
>>
>>Content preview: Sandy and Vaughn, If you use a tissue with a 'plastic'
>> support how do you make your tests for carbon. For me is was a major
>> disadvantage using non-paper tissue. With a paper backing I just cut it
>> into the piece I need for testing. [...]
>>
>>Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required)
>>
>> pts rule name description
>>---- ----------------------
>--------------------------------------------------
>> 1.0 MY_DSL I could use a BL for this.
>> 0.3 COMBINED_FROM Evil froms
>> 2.0 US_8BIT US-ASCII isn't an eight bit charset
>> 1.0 SARE_FROM_SPAM_WORD3 I don't know people named this!
>> 1.4 RATWARE_MS_HASH Bulk email fingerprint (msgid ms hash) found
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>carbon mailing list
>carbon@spitbite.org
>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>carbon mailing list
>carbon@spitbite.org
>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; name="SpamAssassinReport.txt"
>Content-Disposition: inline; filename="SpamAssassinReport.txt"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.414 (Entity 5.414)
>
>Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.clemson.edu", has
>identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
>has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
>similar future email. If you have any questions, see
>postmaster@clemson.edu for details.
>
>Content preview: No, I thought that you were mainly using non paper
> supports because you could reuse hem or doing multiple printing in
> registration. Witho -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van:
> owner-carbon@spitbite.org [mailto:owner-carbon@spitbite.org] Namens
> Sandy King Verzonden: donderdag 28 december 2006 21:54 Aan:
> carbon@spitbite.org Onderwerp: [SPAM] RE: [carbon] can I comment [...]
>
>Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 1.0 MY_DSL I could use a BL for this.
> 0.3 COMBINED_FROM Evil froms
> 2.0 US_8BIT US-ASCII isn't an eight bit charset
> 1.0 SARE_FROM_SPAM_WORD3 I don't know people named this!
> 1.4 RATWARE_MS_HASH Bulk email fingerprint (msgid ms hash) found
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
carbon mailing list
carbon@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
Received on Thu Dec 28 14:41:09 2006