Re: acetone

From: <sanking_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Sun 24 Dec 2006 - 06:36:12 PST

Eric,

What I have tried to convey in my conversations with people and in my
writings is that there is no one single carbon look. Prints can be of any
color imaginable, on virtulaly any surface, can have great relief or no
relief, look pictorial and painterly or extrmely sharp and with hard
edges. All of this is possible with carbon, and I have no preference what
other people do, but I do want them to know that these possibilities
exist. Everything is potentilly capable of making a big difference. For
exmaple, some of my tissue that will give high relief on some papers gives
virtually no relief on other papers. It is hard to be a real master at
this process because there are so many possibilities and things to
control.

The danger with this is that someone will look at a carbon print made in a
particular way assume that this is the only look possible.

Sandy

 Sandy,
>
> You may have misunderstood me. I asked if such prints existed. I
> didn't claim there were no such prints. I travel to various places
> in the country to view prints directly, as I know that looking at
> reproductions in books is not reflective of what the prints really
> look like.
>
> Eric.
>
> On Dec 22, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Sandy King wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Do what you like with your carbon printing, but know for fact
>> certain that many vintage carbon prints show a lot of relief, even
>> if you have never personally seen it.
>>
>> Sandy
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> carbon mailing list
> carbon@spitbite.org
> FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
carbon mailing list
carbon@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
Received on Sun Dec 24 06:36:24 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 01 Jan 2007 - 02:12:59 PST