Re: Black Cat Carbon Tissue

From: Damiano Bianca <damiano.bianca_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Thu 21 Dec 2006 - 03:41:46 PST

ok, my mistake was thinking 0.015. As i wrote, usually i use 0.6 / 0.8 mm.
Now what is the the advantage with 1,55 mm?
may be because the "papier tissu" is not so charged in pigment?

dam

2006/12/21, Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>:
> Damiano,
>
> 1ml per square inch would give around 1.5mm wet height. See below:
>
> Sandy's using 1ml (1 cubic mm) glop per square inch ->
>
> If 25.4mm x 25.4mm x (WH) mm / 1000 = 1 cubic mm
> Then WH = 1.55mm (WH = Wet height)
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
carbon mailing list
carbon@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
Received on Thu Dec 21 03:41:50 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 01 Jan 2007 - 02:12:59 PST