Re: Name's

I like it!

Something like that might work.

I like the International. We've had French, Brazilian, New Zealand,
British,(and others I can't remember) international presenters and a slew
of attendees. I like that aspect and its good for grants.

One thing I want to do is not cut out photographic history, I just want to
see that the technology aspect gets a fair shake which often is not the
case. If we include "standard" photographic history we can cut back a bit
on the geek factor if you get my drift.

There are also orphaned aspects of photography that "art" historians
ignore. Commercial portraiture for example. I read once that NYNY in the
late 1800's had one portrait studio for every 500 residents! The economic
backbone of early photography was the portrait studio. It's nearly a dead
industry. Is anyone going to save the APA archives? Just rambling.

--Dick

   At 11:46 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
> >UPHIS doesn't quite cut it. HISPUP? Historical Process Update? Too
> >cute Gotta think of the grant angle too. Can't be flippant or cute, nor
> >too obscure.
> >
>
>ISHPP ?
>
>International Supposium of (on?) Historic Photographic Processes... "Ishpa"
>
>Not too far from APIS.
>
>Vaughn
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>carbon mailing list
>carbon@spitbite.org
>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html

_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
carbon mailing list
carbon@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
Received on Thu Sep 9 11:40:35 2004