Re: Alternative Name For Alternative Processes

From: Richard Sullivan <richsul_at_domain.name.suppressed>
Date: Wed 08 Sep 2004 - 10:17:53 PDT

The problem is analog is the analog of digital. That is it really only came
into common usage to describe a non-digital systems. That to me then is
defining the method as being not digital in origin. Is a platinum print
made with a digital neg an analog print?

--Dick

At 07:05 PM 9/7/2004, you wrote:
>I must admit "Analog Processes/Printing" makes the most sense to me so
>far...though not as elegent as "vintage" or "historical".
>
>Vaughn
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "William Winkler" <wildbillbugman@yahoo.com>
>
>
> > Hello to All,
> > I do agree with Sandy about what he wrote in his last
> > post on this matter. Here is my two cents worth. Why
> > not "Analog Processes" or "Analog Printing"? This
> > would incompus everything not Digital, including
> > silver gelatin. If Alt Process is used with digitaly
> > captured negs it would just be "Analog Printing".
> > Cheerio,
> > Bill
>
>_______________________________________________
>Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
>carbon mailing list
>carbon@spitbite.org
>FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html

_______________________________________________
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
carbon mailing list
carbon@spitbite.org
FAQ at http://spitbite.org/carbon/list.html
Received on Wed Sep 8 10:18:28 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 02:23:09 PST